The Fusion Breakthrough

The Fusion Breakthrough

Description image by Rob Adamson Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University.
  • First Posted: Mar 14 2010 22:43 PM
  • Updated: 3 months ago

We might very well be on the verge of producing a clean, safe, small, and unlimited supply of electrical energy.

It has been almost sixty years since we were first told that a clean, safe, and unlimited supply of electrical energy from nuclear fusion was only ten to twenty years away. Yet here we are, ten years into the twenty-first century, and instead of the Mr. Fusion reactors we were promised in Back to the Future, we are opening new coal plants and digging deeper into the oil sands to try to satiate a hungry world's appetite for energy.

Nuclear fusion is our species' attempt to tap into the process through which most of the universe's energy is generated. Hydrogen, the most abundant of the elements, is unstable under conditions of sufficiently high pressure and temperature. In places where these conditions are met, the centre of the sun for example, two hydrogen nuclei can come together to form helium, releasing massive amounts of energy in the process.

And by massive, I mean ridiculously massive. Two grams of the stuff would be enough to power the average car for twenty years. It is no surprise, then, that the first application of fusion was to give an extra bit of kick to the world's nuclear arsenals, creating bombs about 100 times more power than the fission-based one that levelled Hiroshima.

Unfortunately, efforts to create a controlled nuclear fusion reaction that creates net energy, the kind that can be safely housed inside an electrical generating station, have so far been unsuccessful, despite billions in investment and years of work from some of the smartest brains in physics and engineering. It is the carrot that keeps dangling just outside the reach of the world’s scientific community.

It isn't that fusion is all that difficult to achieve. Dozens of different kinds of working fusion reactors have been built. The simplest of them, the Farnsworth-Hirsch reactor, fits on a table and can be built for a few hundred dollars. There is even an active community of amateur nuclear fusion enthusiasts who build such contraptions in their basements and swap tips over the internet.

The problem is that these devices are incapable of producing a net surplus of energy. Without exception, they require a large amount of energy to be put into the material undergoing fusion and too great a loss of that material as things start to heat up.

To be a viable energy source, a fusion scheme must be capable of producing far more energy than is required to run it. So far, there are two technologies that have the capacity to achieve this goal.

The more mature of the two is magnetic-confinement fusion, a technique wherein hydrogen is heated to several million degrees and kept confined by magnetic fields. There is a massive US$10 billion project currently underway in southern France that is attempting to build magnetic confinement capable of producing as much power as a small fission reactor. It is scheduled to be completed in 2018. If it works, it could well provide the template for large-scale fusion reactors around the world.

But 2010 is the year in which the fusion community will find out about the viability of the second approach, inertial confinement fusion. In the coming months, all eyes will be on the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories in Stanford. There, scientists are aiming the world's most energetic laser at a capsule of frozen hydrogen about the size of a peppercorn.

For a brief billionth of a second, the laser will direct power equivalent to the total output of all the electrical plants in North America at this tiny capsule. The blast will cause the outer layers of the capsule to explode and the inner layers to be compressed. This compression and heating will cause the hydrogen to fuse together and release energy. Each little peppercorn should produce as much energy as a barrel of oil.

The lab has set itself the goal of achieving such a reaction, called ignition, this year. Last month, they showed that they can create explosions in the outer layers that symmetrically compress their capsules. The next step will be putting the hydrogen inside and seeing what happens.

Admittedly, it isn't Mr. Fusion, but if ignition is achieved this year, it opens up the possibility of cheap, small nuclear fusion. And if we want to kick our fossil fuel habit for good, that is very good news.

TAGS: Technology

Comments

Re:Marks

rules of engagement

Check out the National Ignition Facility home page, it has a great video of how this fusion reaction will be achieved. I was hoping to see a Canadian angle in the above article on the subject of nuclear fusion. I don' t know of any, but I'll tell you about a Canadian connection that might have been. So how is such a system designed with any confidence that it will work? More importantly, how can they be sure the reaction will not get out of control venting a nuclear cloud over suburban Livermore, California? The answer is supercomputing. The Livermore facility is home to some of the largest supercomputers ever built by the Department of Energy in the US. When nuclear testing was banned, facilities like the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory were built to turn the task of nuclear research over to computer simulation. To accurately simulate nuclear reactions in a computer requires machines with thousands of identical processors running in perfect synchronization. In March 2005 LLNL built with IBM the first supercomputer to exceed 100 TeraFLOPs of performance. But at LLNL, as soon as one machine is built, the plans for the next one begin. A small Canadian start-up company from Ottawa was invited to propose a computer architecture for a PetaFLOP machine. This proposal was delivered along with a small (refrigerator sized) prototype supercomputer built in Kanata, Ontario by former Nortel engineers. Although the prototype machine was installed at LLNL, and early prototypes achieved many of the performance targets set by LLNL, a system was not purchased. That's the Canadian connection to nuclear fusion that might have been. Unfortunately the dream of a Canadian designed and built supercomputer died with the start-up that built them a few weeks ago when they ran out of funds. This company was able to sell a few systems for non-supercomputing tasks, but it was never able to win a supercomputing sale. I often wonder if the Canadian government had purchased a supercomputer from this little company, if it would have been enough to bring it to self-sustainability. Unfortunately our government does not have procurement vehicles to help along start-ups like this. Although Canada may not be directly involved in solving the science and engineering of nuclear fusion, there are other such "grand challenge" problems that are being solved by supercomputing technology. Canada can have a role if it chooses to invest in supercomputing technology. We toss a bit of money for universities to build some nice systems to support academic research, but there is no national strategy to advance supercomputing technology for industry in Canada. It should be a component of Canada's Digital Economic Strategy, it is for practically all other advanced nations. Maybe energy comes too easy for Canada, with clean hydro, lots of fossil fuels, and lots of uranium; the relative comfort of the present doesn't impel us to invest as strongly in the future as we should. Mr. Fusion will not likely be invented in Canada, but if some of the new game changing technologies of the future are not invented here, Canada will cease to be one of the best places in the world to live.

Ron Van Holst

Just a quick correction: Lawrence Livermore National Lab is in Livermore, California.... and is in no way affiliated with Stanford University. One of the partners of our management is the University of California, which was the sole manager from 1952 until the current management corporation took over a few years ago. More information about the National Ignition Facility is at: https://lasers.llnl.gov

Bob Hirschfeld

LATEST NEWS

Kobayashi Wolfs Down 332 Wings in Half-Hour

We're not worthy! We're not worthy!...

American Job Numbers Up, Canadian Numbers Down

Are we beginning to see a reversal in th...

Roseanne Barr Running for President on Green Ticket

Blue-collar comedienne reminds us once a...

Two out of Every Three Tweets Are Useless

But not your precious little snowflake o...

U.S. No-Fly List Doubles in One Year

Three cheers for the ever-expanding defi...

Will The NHL's Concussion Problem Become an Insurance Problem?

Reports suggest insurers don't want to c...

Russian Presidential Candidate Wants To Be 'Tsar'

Fed up with westernizations such as the ...

See the Dark Side of the Moon

... without paying $400 to see Roger Wat...

Facebook Expected To File IPO Today

The world waits to find out how much Zuc...

Neil Young, Steve Jobs and A New iPod?

The boomer pair bonded over their mutual...

German Satellite Just Missed Crashing into Beijing

At this point, our orbit is one giant in...

Romney Trounces Field in Florida Primary

Four states down, 46 to go....

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.