Why Is Airport Security So Unpleasant?
- First Posted: Mar 02 2010 02:10 AM
- Updated: 4 months
You would think that authorities would be more committed to making the travel experience as pleasant as possible.
I realize that I am one of the lucky ones. I fly on business almost every week of my life, which earns me Super-Elite status on Air Canada, shorter line-ups, lounge access and frequent upgrades. But still, making my way through the airport has become a quagmire of inconsistency, hassles, and unpleasantness.
Does it really need to be this way? Absolutely not!
Since the events of September 11, 2001, airport security has been more complicated and more paranoid than ever before. It took time, but we began to get used to the new reality. Then, over the 2009 year-end holiday, the incident of the failed Nigerian underwear bomber tipped things over the edge. Dealing with airport security has long been unpleasant, but now it has reached an all-time low.
Every time I fly, I never know exactly what the rules are and whether or not they will be the same as the last time. Before every flight, I go to the Canada Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA) website to get the most recent rules and regulations about carry-on luggage. But frankly, I am never sure. The site is unclear, rarely updated – and even when it is, it seems as if the agents at the airport are singing from a different hymnbook. Even at the Super-Elite hotline, they don’t know what to say anymore.
Last week, as I was entering the U.S. immigration hall, the security agent instructed me to transfer all the contents of my briefcase into my carry-on. This was completely different from the procedure of previous weeks, and there had been no change notified on the CATSA site. When I asked for the reason, the agent simply said: “They are extra sensitive today.” But the supervisor at the security belt exclaimed that the agent didn’t know what he was doing. This confusion and inconsistency seems to be the norm at the airport.
Here’s a story from a week earlier: a fellow passenger was amazed that I had been allowed to keep my carry-on bag. The agent next to mine, just a few feet away at the check-in counter, had refused him permission to bring his identical bag aboard even though the rules explicitly allowed it. Unfortunately, these types of incidents seem to be happening constantly. Surely there is no reason why competent security needs to be synonymous with passenger harassment and flying blind about the rules.
The measures required to protect passenger and airport safety are no different than any other massive change that organizations frequently have to implement. In fact, CATSA and its counterparts are in a rapidly growing business these days.
Any successful change initiative requires crystal-clear communication at all levels, and a true commitment to serve customers well. Airport security should be no exception. The fact that travelling has become such a nightmare tells me that there is a problem of leadership.
CATSA, its counterparts and the airlines need to step up to the plate. The economy is bleeding. Cross-border trade and tourism are suffering. Even U.S. Ivy League universities are attracting fewer foreign students – an ominous development in the long run.
You would think that, given these challenges and the fact that security measures are intrusive and uncomfortable to begin with, the authorities would be more sensitive and committed to making the travel experience as pleasant as possible. Unfortunately, I have not felt that to date. For me, and for many others who will continue to travel on a weekly basis, the solutions can’t come too soon.





Comments
Re:Marks
“ New security measures implemented since 9/11 are based on security through obfuscation. It is security theatre in the common parlance. The security system is a black box into which no one is allowed to look. Security by obfuscation is failure prone. With open systems, smart people outside the system look at it and try to break it, reporting faults and correcting the system. With closed systems, criminals try to break the system, telling no one when they succeed. The airport security people keep their system a black box (who is on the US no fly list, how many lists are there) because if the public was allowed to look inside it would become clear that they are offering no real security. Just smoke and mirrors security. It is a black box to prevent embarrassment to the authorities. In much the same way that many claims of national security - the documentation of Afghan detainee transfers currently being withheld on national security grounds by the Harper government - are made solely to avoid embarrassment to the government and the security agencies.
Brent Beach
RELATED ARTICLES
More Canadians Ready for an Election
With alternative choices available, and decreasing support for the Conservatives, Canadians want a new government.
Five Controversial Magazine Covers
As Time creates a stir with the image on its latest issue, The Mark recalls some other covers that attracted coverage.
Canada's Jersey Shore: A Q&A
The Mark caught up with the creator of Canada's next hit reality TV show, Lake Shore, to find out if it's really the next Jersey Shore.
What Media Crisis?
Certain media conglomerates may be in trouble, but the industry as a whole is hardly sliding into oblivion.
Let's Keep Innovation Innovative
As technology and concepts become obsolete, common sense shouldn't.
Our Disappearing Water
Climate change is taking a big gulp out of Canada's freshwater supply.
Introducing the “New Hire and Census” Form
The Harper government has found a way to revise the census and remake Canada's public service at the same time.
A Libertarian Solution to the Census Debacle
A lot of people disagree with Harper's decision to make the long-form census voluntary. So let's all fill it out.