A (Sort of) Happy Tax Freedom Day

A (Sort of) Happy Tax Freedom Day

Description image by Niels Veldhuis Director of fiscal studies and a Senior Economist at the Fraser Institute.
  • First Posted: Jun 08 2009 12:44 PM
  • Updated: about 1 year

Tax Freedom Day provides Canadian taxpayers with an opportunity to reflect on whether they're getting their money's worth.

(Co-authored by Milagros Palacios)

On Saturday June 6, Canadians across the country celebrated Tax Freedom Day, the day the average Canadian has earned enough money to cover the total amount of taxes that they are obliged to pay to various levels of Canadian government. From that time on, Canadians are working for themselves and their families.

With the income tax filing deadline having just passed, many Canadians are likely still getting over the shock of just how much income tax they paid last year. Income taxes, however, account for only about one-third of the total taxes Canadians pay. Add property taxes, sales taxes, profit taxes, health taxes, social security taxes, alcohol taxes, tobacco taxes, fuel taxes and many others to the mix and the average Canadian will pay $37,700 in taxes (42.6 per cent of income) in 2009.

It is of course, near impossible for an average Canadian to calculate their total tax bill. Therein lies the value of Tax Freedom Day: it gives Canadians an easy-to-understand, accurate measure of the taxes they pay. It may not be a day whose passing will be marked by an official government proclamation, but it is an important, easy-to-understand, and accurate measure that average Canadians use to gauge how much tax they actually pay.

Fortunately, Tax Freedom Day arrived three days earlier in 2009 than in 2008. But before we get too excited, it is important to understand that the reduction in taxes has little to do with tax reductions by either the federal or provincial governments. Instead, the economic downturn has automatically eased the tax burden on the economy and resulted in an earlier Tax Freedom Day.

In times like these when the economy slows and incomes decline, the tax burden of Canadian families tends to be reduced to a greater extent than income. That means an earlier Tax Freedom Day. Chalk up this accelerated decrease in the tax burden compared to decreases in income to the progressive nature of the Canadian tax system.

Progressivity means that as individuals earn more income, they pay proportionately more in taxes. The reverse is also true. It is this reverse phenomenon that produces an earlier Tax Freedom Day.

Changes aside, the real concern for most Canadians is whether they receive good value for the $37,700 dollars they pay in taxes on average. While many Canadians happily pay their taxes to support the numerous government programs they believe are effective, many others are outraged at the level of taxation and the poor quality of the government services they finance.

On the benefits side, Canadians should consider the findings of the 2007 study Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison, which measured the efficiency of the public sectors in Canada and 23 countries. The study found that Canada’s public sector was relatively inefficient and that we should be able to achieve the same outcomes from government programs while using only 75 per cent of current resources. In other words, there is approximately 25 per cent waste in Canada’s public sector.

In addition, Canada’s Auditor General consistently finds case after case of government cost overruns, unnecessary spending, improperly managed programs, and other examples of government failure.

Let’s not forget the massive “stimulus” packages included in this year’s federal and provincial budgets, which will benefit a host of special interest groups including farmers, the auto industry, forestry, tourism, environmentalists, aboriginals, and arts and culture. Nor should we forget the $10.5 billion the federal government just poured into General Motors.

Canadians should also remember that we’re not paying for all of this spending now - the federal government and most provincial governments are running deficits this year and into the foreseeable future. At some point, however, this debt must be paid back by taxes. In other words, deficits should be considered as deferred taxation. And it is also why later Tax Freedom Days in the future are a real possibility.

If Canadian governments actually had to cover current expenditures with current taxation and were not able to defer any of the tax burden by running a deficit, Tax Freedom Day would be significantly later in the year. In fact, it would arrive on June 25 – 19 days later.

On that note, Happy Tax Freedom Day.

TAGS: Business

Comments

Re:Marks

rules of engagement

Happy Tax Freedom Day, Mr. Veldhuis! But you are late; most Canadians celebrated this holiday weeks or months ago. ``and the average Canadian will pay $37,700 in taxes (42.6 per cent of income) in 2009. '' Meaning that the `average' Canadian will have an income of $88,500. Just another clue that the Fraser institute might not, in fact, have any clue about `average' Canadians -- or worse, that they're willing to resort to bad statistics to make their point if better statistics won't do it. Most Canadians would be very suprised indeed to hear that the `average' individual Canadian will have a 2009 income of $88,500. Indeed, Statscan tells us that for 2007 (the latest for which good numbers are available), a typical *family* income Canada-wide was just $61,800. So what's with the numbers? The Fraser institute is using mean income to form their average, and is being deliberately misleading in doing so. For a distribution with such huge upwards swings as income, this means that the very few very rich hugely distort the numbers. (Like in the old joke where Bill Gates walks into a blue-collar bar filled with regulars; ``Wahoo!'' shouts one. ``on average, we're all millionaires!'') Sometimes this distortion matters, and sometimes it doesn't. But when one is describing what happens to an average Canadian individual - who most certainly does not make $88,500 a year - it does. And it particularly does when describing tax freedom day. As is mentioned, the Canadian tax system is mildly progressive (but only mildly; income tax is, but as the author mentions, this is only one of many taxes; most of the others, like sales taxes, gas taxes, etc are fairly regressive in that they hit the poor much harder than the rich). So by distorting the numbers so that they tilt towards the rich, the `average' tax burden is also distorted upwards. But a more appropriate, median-based `tax freedom day' wouldn't make the point they want to make, so it's discarded. It's always a shame when ideology wins out over actually trying to solve real economic problems.

Jonathan Dursi

play

FEATURED VIDEO

Meet Carrie the dancing dog from Chile.

The Merengue-Dancing Dog

Meet Carrie the dancing dog from Chile.