Old mining belt

Bill C-300 is Mining for Change

Description image by Shefa Siegel Lead Environment and Policy Researcher, Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.
  • First Posted: Oct 25 2010 02:24 AM
  • Updated: over 1 year ago

Passing a private member's bill to legislate responsible mining practices is the right thing to do, ethically and economically.

International exchanges of mining expertise are among the earliest recorded forms of foreign aid and diplomacy. In antiquity, when King Solomon – ruler of the land of milk and honey, not minerals and mines – broke ground on his temple atop Jerusalem, he asked the King of Tyre to lend him a metallurgical consultant.

Meanwhile, the original conference of the kind now hosted by the UN and other international institutions was held in the Hungarian mining town of Schemnitz. According to the 19th century naturalist Alexander Von Humboldt, "The learned of every nation met at the Congress of Schemnitz" to disseminate the German method of using mercury to accelerate silver extraction.

But the first modern proponent of international mining cooperation was a Canadian civil servant, Dr. Hugh Keenleyside, who, in the late 1940s, led the infant UN's first technical assistance mission, a study of Bolivia's failing tin mines. This mission led to Keenleyside's selection as director of the Technical Assistance Administration, a long-forgotten UN bureaucracy that preceded what we now know as international development.

Among other projects during his tenure, Keenleyside pushed for his vision of global cooperation in the mining sector. But as postwar internationalism spread in scope, mining drifted from a priority to a novelty, and across the eco-humanitarian conventions from the 1960s through the 1990s, there was a consistent theme: mining got left out.

Now, 60 years after Keenleyside's cry for an ethics of extraction, we finally have Bill C-300 – the responsible mining bill.

The private member’s bill was introduced in February 2009 by Liberal MP John McKay, following five years of debate over the human rights and environmental standards of Canada's oil, gas, and mining companies operating in developing countries.

The bill is scheduled for a vote on Oct. 27. If successful, it will lay the legislative foundation for corporate responsibility in the extractive industries by creating an accessible mechanism for complaints and ensuring the Government of Canada invests public funds only in corporations that comply with environmental and human rights standards. A bill with similar objectives was signed into law in the United States in July.

However, the bill is meeting stiff resistance from people in the industry, who have voiced suspicions that the motive behind the bill is to "punish" companies.

In a discussion about this bill, McKay told me, "There’s a saying in law school: 'When you've got neither law nor facts, just pound the table.' That's what [critics of the bill] are doing – pounding the table. We could have put punitive measures in this bill, but there are no criminal sanctions or civil damages. Mining will continue as usual – we just want them to be responsible."

Canada has a bipolar international reputation, as anyone who goes to remote parts of the developing world may discover. I once traveled to Adamah, a town in southern Ethiopia, where the people say, “When there is drought in Ethiopia, pray for rain in Canada” – a reference to their appreciation for Canadian food aid. This gratitude for our provision of wheat still buys a Canadian a cup of coffee or a bolt or two of araki.

The flipside of this reputation, however, is the perception of Canadian industry – especially junior mining companies – as particularly unscrupulous.

I spent September in Colombia, where the area I was scheduled to work – a mining town still scarred by the violent chaos and massacres of 1980s and ’90s – was impassable due to the arrival of a Canadian gold mining company.

Six months earlier, the company had leased a claim in this troubled region, only to discover there were already 7,000 miners working the concession. The company's ultimatum to the miners – give up using mercury within three months (an impossible request) or get out – helped spark syndicalist protests marked by a general strike and renewed alliances with guerrillas.

TAGS: Politics

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

The Spirit Bear has come to symbolize the mystery and greatness of the West Coast but also what is threatened by oil interests.

<i>Tipping Barrels</i> follows surfers into the Great Bear Rainforest, where they learn more about the region and issues confronting it.

Tipping Barrels Follows Surfers into Great Bear Rainforest

The Spirit Bear has come to symbolize the mystery and greatness of the West Coast but also what is threatened by oil interests. Tipping Barrels follows surfers into the Great Bear Rainforest, where they learn more about the region and issues confronting it.