Global Warming's Not Back. It Never Went Away
- First Posted: Jun 22 2009 08:27 AM
- Updated: 12 months
Though the cool weather of recent years is consistent with global warming, there's no doubt the dip has hurt the cause.
AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) is a long-term upward trend in global temperatures overlain upon natural climatic shifts. So, for example, one of these natural shifts is La Niña,
One of the more pernicious myths spread by the AGW Denialist movement has been that climate scientists did not anticipate the relatively cooler temperatures of the past two years (but only relatively cooler – even 2008 was one of the 10 warmest years on record, and '09 is tracking to be somewhat warmer than '08).
This is not the case. As far back as August 2007, scientists at Hadley Centre in Exeter (UK) were forecasting chillier times ahead, and sourced La Niña as cause:
As the Guardian reported in 2007, "[Their] forecast ... reveals that natural shifts in climate will cancel out warming produced by greenhouse gas emissions and other human activity until 2009....
[...]
Climate scientists say the new high-precision forecast predicts temperatures will stall because of natural climate effects that have seen the Southern Ocean and tropical Pacific cool over the past couple of years."
The "tropical Pacific cool" noted in the last paragraph above is our La Niña.
So far so good. But that's not the end of the story. The flip-side to La Niña is the more familiar El Niño, its warm water counterpart. The effects of El Niño on global temperatures are well known to scientists. For example, in 1998 an extremely intense El Niño gave us the warmest or second-warmest years on record.
Now here comes the good part. Several months ago, talk of the next El Niño event began percolating on some of the climate science blogs, because there hasn't been one in awhile and they tend to follow La Niña events.
And, from today's Fiji News:
"The signs of a developing El Niño have strengthened in the past two weeks, says Meteorology Department director Rajendra Prasad. As of June 17, Mr. Prasad said rainfall was well below average at all observation sites, except Rotuma and Ono-i-Lau."
So let's do a full circle and return to the Hadley Centre forecast from 2007, as reported by the Guardian:
"[From 2009 on], temperatures will rise steadily. Temperatures are set to rise over the 10-year period by 0.3C. Beyond 2014, the odds of breaking the temperature record rise even further, the scientists added."
Some have wondered whether the momentum towards action on the AGW issue could be sustained over a short stretch of less steamy weather, and indeed a few polls have shown less public support (especially in the U.S) for the kind of actions scientists have called for.
You can't help but wonder if the negotiations leading up to Copenhagen could have come at a less fortuitous time.









Comments
Re:Marks
“ I think that the policy makers, especially the ones who are working towards change through new energy policy and green - initiatives are well aware of AGW. I also think that scientists who support the AGW model for our current predicament will be in attendance at the summit so hopefully it gains a little traction at the summit.
Skyler Hype