Michael Ignatieff

In Praise of Coalitions

Description image by Barbara J. Falk Associate Professor, Canadian Forces College.
  • First Posted: Mar 29 2011 07:25 AM
  • Updated: 3 days ago

A coalition government would mean a more mature Parliament – and could even strengthen national unity.

The federal Tories have definitely been given their electoral marching orders by the party’s campaign strategists. Whenever, wherever possible, drop the word “coalition” (complete with the scare quotes) into each and every stump speech and media scrum. Make it seem that the Liberals are already in bed with the New Democrats and the Bloc Québécois, and suggest that the country will inexorably fall apart with a coalition government should Canadians be so thoughtless as to not elect a Harper majority.

Indeed, according to the prime minister, such a “reckless” coalition will inevitably generate high taxes, slow job growth, kill jobs, and be bad for families. Are you kidding me?

It’s time for the other party leaders to challenge this fear-mongering head-on, and in the process educate Canadians about the role of coalition governments in parliamentary systems. First, they happen all the time in parliamentary democracies, and countries with routine experience of them generally don’t implode. Second, they tend to be quite focused and productive in terms of legislative output – because all coalition partners have to work out deals and compromise with each other in order to make the government work.

Third, the more parties involved in governing, the better behaved politicians usually are because there are quite a few of them left holding the bag in terms of public accountability. Fourth, coalition governments ensure a much broader level of pan-national representation at the executive level, and that’s where the power usually is (regardless of the actual legal location of sovereignty). Fifth, by giving a slice of governance to minority parties, such parties become more mature and responsible through the experience (in effect, they grow up a bit).

Finally – and this is the very best part – coalition governments can help generate a sense of national unity. In Canada there can never be too much of that. Indeed, given what we know about coalition governments elsewhere – in Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, and now the United Kingdom – this seems exactly what the Canadian parliamentary system needs at the moment.

Imagine a scenario where Canadian politicians were forced to work together more than scream at each other, where those on the outside got a taste of governing and therefore figured out how tough it is when you have to rule on behalf of all Canadians, not just those who routinely vote for you, and a more balanced cabinet was possible with a larger talent pool to draw from, with greater representation from those often perennially underrepresented: women and minorities.

Of course not all coalition governments work well; some fall apart, often for exactly the same reasons minority governments fall apart. Sometimes consensus-based politics does not yield clear-cut decisions. Ideologically rigid parties or those inhabiting an extreme end of the political spectrum can hold the mainstream hostage on issues near and dear to them. But these situations are contradicted by the many successful coalition governments worldwide.

Moreover, Canada actually has previous experience with coalition governments. Canada’s first government under John A. Macdonald was a coalition government, lasting from 1867 until 1872. In fact, a coalition government has been increasingly likely since the traditional three-party system at the federal level collapsed with the dual challenges posed by Reform in Western Canada and the Bloc Québécois. That was 1993. We have not had a seriously national government since then.

Because of the unpredictable nature of our first-past-the-post plurality system and the fact that, yes, electoral campaigns do matter tremendously in swaying voters (usually the relatively large block of undecided voters), Canadians cannot plan in advance to generate a coalition government. But we should certainly not live in fear of one because of the shrill rhetoric of a government bent on obtaining a majority at all costs.

Photos courtesy of Reuters.

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

The Spirit Bear has come to symbolize the mystery and greatness of the West Coast but also what is threatened by oil interests.

<i>Tipping Barrels</i> follows surfers into the Great Bear Rainforest, where they learn more about the region and issues confronting it.

Tipping Barrels Follows Surfers into Great Bear Rainforest

The Spirit Bear has come to symbolize the mystery and greatness of the West Coast but also what is threatened by oil interests. Tipping Barrels follows surfers into the Great Bear Rainforest, where they learn more about the region and issues confronting it.